These participants can be your friends, family members or classmates etc. All reviewers should use identical device settings. (4) Invite two other persons to review the nominated website. Draw particular attention to the interaction and usability aspects of the interface. (3) Identify the positive and negative aspects of the website.
(2) Identify and elaborate the main feature or features of the website. Provide an overview and description of the nominated website. (1) Clearly identify the nominated website. Generic notebook or desktop with display greater than 1280×768 pixels.Īny mobile device with display approximately 480×640 to 700×960 pixels, in bothlandscape and portrait orientation.Īny mobile device with display approximately 200×320 to 400×640 pixels, in bothlandscape and portrait orientation. Students are free to select the different simulated device (in the Chrome device simulator) they would like to use for the reviews. Your review of the nominated website must be thorough and sufficiently comprehensive to include 5 different screen displays. This is to ensure that all students have access to consistent and identical review tools.
#MICROSOFT EXPRESSION WEB 4 RESPONSIVE DESIGN SIMULATOR#
For the purpose and intention of this assessment, use only the device simulator for your reviews. The nominated website should be reviewed using Google Chrome’s device simulator. The purpose of the report is to provide a critical evaluation of the nominated website and to support your observations and comments convincingly.
Support your critique with appropriate RWD principles. The report should draw particular attention to the interactive aspects and design aspects relating to responsiveness of the overall website. The review is to be carried out within the context of responsive web design (RWD) and development principles. Upon the completion of the task, you are to provide a formal report documenting your critical evaluation of the website. Select and undertake an in-depth evaluation of the following website: Assessment details for: Written Assessment (30 marks).
0 kommentar(er)
